Blog myspace

Avatar

Your mum isn’t on Twitter

A SXSW brain dump via Bambuser threw up an interesting concept for me when Stef Lewandowski asked the question “is your mum on Twitter?”

That simple rhetorical question for me encapsulates the state of the Social Internet as it is. We have a whole raft of great apps available to us for free, but we as early adopters seem, in my opinion to have difficulty bridging the gap between what is a “cool application” and what an average web user can gain from it in his/her day-to-day life.

I was in the pub with a mate who’s a student at Leeds University. After listening to some of his tales of drunken misdeeds I quickly found myself evangelising tools like Twitter. Here I thought was a prime example of how an app such as this can be used to great effect, for one thing by the University itself. What is a lecture was cancelled? What if students needed a quick reminder that an important project was due? What if the local Rock Soc had organised a pissup somewhere? This is all fairly obvious stuff but there are myriad uses for it in and outside the education service.

What’s interesting is that, even for students who spend three years of their lives learning and developing so are not afraid of hearing about new developments in worlds that interest them, it’s very difficult to make the leap from “yeah, that’s cool; right, I’m off to the bar” and “yeah, that’s cool, what’s the address again?”

I wholeheartedly believe that everyone can benefit from such a unique app, but that’s not true of the entire Social Internet. The beauty of Twitter is that you don’t need to be connected to the Web after you’ve signed up: you can do everything via SMS, and even my mum’s got a mobile.

So do the monitor and keyboard form the barrier between great services and the digitally bewildered? My mum sends emails and maintains a blog (would you believe) but using my dad as a proxy, so she never really uses the Internet; but she’ll happily send a text on her mobile. So does it just come back to the fear of breaking the Internet, or is it just too much effort? If you could plug your camera into your TV and upload your photos via your digibox, would more people start using Flickr for example?

These questions can’t be answered for all sites, especially when you get onto social media behemoths like Spacebook or MyFace, but these often contain elements of other sites (Facebook status vs Twitter tweets, MySpace Music vs Last.fm etc).

Google are starting to understand that the beauty of the Internet is such that you don’t need to be sat infront of a 17" screen to experience it, and in the case of some of Google’s telephony services you can take a screen of any size out of the equation entirely.

So do the early adopters need to bridge the gap or should it be on the heads of the app developers to make their services available without the big scary screen?

Stop, you’re killing Facebook!

I’m sure I’m not the first - and I won’t be the last - to comment on the future of Facebook, but the simple fact is that it needs to be said: if we’re not careful, Facebook will die a unique death: not because of spam (like MySpace) or constant crashes (no, that fate is reserved for Twitter) but simply because of its very beautiful but much abused applications architecture.

The Facebook community is very savvy to this, hosting a number of groups that call for the developers to either

  1. ban applications from demanding that the user invites their friends, or
  2. scrap the entire architecture completely.

The second will never happen because systems like Photos, Videos and indeed Groups are built on this architecture. I think the first suggestion is a good one, but it doesn’t stop the problem because, although I receive very few application requests now, I still see the items in my News Feed and am constantly assailed with statements like “Steve has added the Are You a Fish or a Microwave application”. [Shudder]

 

I think first off there needs to be a clear distinction between

  • a functional enhancement to the system (like Photos and Videos etc),
  • a box to add to your profile (like Where I’ve Been or What I’m Listening to) and
  • a waste of time (like Super Wall or Pirates vs Vampires or whatever).

Mark Zuckerberg and his team then need to work on allowing users to specify which application-types they might be interested in, and better still categorise the apps based on interests (Catbook for pet lovers, What I’m Reading for the bookish types etc). Then, much like the Profile Cleaner Greasemonkey script, we need the choice to ban applications from displaying on other people’s pages, so we can get straight to someone’s Wall to leave them a message.

 

If you’re not a massive Facebook user, here’s just a taster of some of the applications in my block list, in alphabetical order:

  • Animated GIFTS (does Facebook not already have a Gifts application, and why do they need animating?)
  • Aston Villa Fans and Aston Villans (why use two disparate apps when one group will do?)
  • Could you pass the U.S. Citizenship test? (isn’t this what Posted Items are for?)
  • Flirt With Hotties (is Facebook now doing 0898 numbers?)
  • FunWall (the team improved the Wall so apps like this could be removed)
  • Instant Messaging (cast your eyes to the top of the screen. See where it says Inbox? Now don’t let the door hit you on the way out)
  • Nicest Friends (how bad would you feel if you weren’t on this list?)
  • PENIS or VAGINA? (just a coffee thanks)
  • Poke Pro (for when poking isn’t enough and you have to be that extra 10% more irritating)
  • R U CUTE! (no, but I can spell and I don’t speak like a moron)
  • Say Merry Christmas (it’s February)
  • Scrabulous (why would I go to your Facebook profile to play Scrabble when I can do that on any number of sites?)
  • Send Diamonds, Send Good Karma, Send Roses (see Gifts)
  • Vampires, WereWolves (I’m none of the above; neither am I a pirate or a zombie)
  • What Age Do You Act? (old enough to know how to use the Internet)
  • What Drink Are You?, What Drug Are You?, What Underwear Are You? (the list goes on)
  • what type of dancer are you? (this developer hasn’t even bothered to capitalise the name of his app)
  • Who Has The Biggest Brain? (me: I have a tidy profile)

Facebook, it’s time to tighten up.

 

Social networks: shrinking the Web one page at a time

I call myself a “new media junkie”. Now in order to live up to that name I need to do a fair bit of social networking: this may involve blogging, using Facebook (a lot) or answering questions on LinkedIn, and I love it.However, the increasing problem I’ve noticed is that, as more and more people use sites like MySpace to promote their music, YouTube to show off their videos or LinkedIn to shmoose, fewer and fewer people are getting their own websites developed.

Obviously as a web developer this presents something of a professional concern (if only a small one, as I’m only really talking about portfolio sites), but as a personal “fan” of the Web, I think it’s a real shame.

I certainly can’t blame people for doing it: it’s free, very easy and requires little promotion, as people will automatically find you and your content based on the network you inhabit, but it does serve to make the Internet just that little smaller and more uniform.

Is it possible the ubermarket invasion currently taking place on our high streets could be echoed online? Will smaller, independent sites be cut down by the mighty scythe of big business?

(Cue ominous music)